RADIO DRAMA REVIEWS ONLINE

Rumours by Colin Shindler

Home
AUTHORS A-J
AUTHORS K-R
AUTHORS S-Z
DRAMATISTS A-Z
Contact Us

Saturday Drama on BBC Radio 4

BBC Radio 4, 21 September 2013
 
In the wake of Radio 4's season of classic Sixties adaptations, Rumours took us back to 1963, when the three editors of Private Eye - Richard Ingrams (Harry Hadden-Paton), Willie Rushton (Ewan Bailey) and Christopher Booker (Gunnar Cauthery) - were heavily involved in exposing the seamy underbelly of the Establishment.  They focused a lot of their venom on the then Prime Minister Harold Macmillan (John Rowe) - an Old Etonian and representative of a fast-disappearing world of privilege and social division.
 
The Profumo scandal helped cement Private Eye's reputation as the leading satirical magazine of the day.  Try as they might, the main actors involved - especially Profumo - could not cover their tracks successfully; Dr. Stephen Ward (Carl Prekopp) understood this, and ended up making a quasi-Faustian pact with the editors by promising to reveal everything about the affair.  Needless to say the editors refused; Ward ended up being accused of crimes he did not commit; and committed suicide as a result.
 
Marc Beeby's production had several virtues: Bailey's performance as Rushton was beautifully realized.  Here was a man who acquired rapid fame by impersonating Macmillan on That Was the Week That Was, but rapidly lost it when the Prime Minister resigned.  He found it difficult to cope with this experience, and ended up slightly frustrated.  Rowe's Macmillan came across as a sympathetic figure - a representative of the Old Guard trying his best to come to terms with a rapidly changing world.  He was neither the "Supermac" of popular myth, nor the old fuddy-duddy as constructed by Private Eye, but a reasonable man let down by members of his government whom he (erroneously) trusted.
 
Nonetheless I have to admit that the play as a whole was rather diffuse in structure - although not directly about the Profumo Affair, it included too many details which seemed over-familiar.  Perhaps more time could have been spent on characterizing the three Private Eye editors; both Booker and Ingrams were sketchily drawn.