Mrs. Updike by
Margaret Heffernan (2013). Dir. John
Dove. Perf. Eileen Atkins, Charles
Edwards. BBC Radio 3, 18 Jan. 2015. BBCiPlayer
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01qkvv0
to 18 Feb. 2015.
Adam Begley’s recent
biography
of Updike (2014) creates a portrait of a writer totally committed to his art at
the expense of everything and anyone else.
Even as an adolescent he felt detached from “home,” despite the best
efforts of his over-protective mother and easy-father. On the other hand Updike
spent his entire
life trying to discover a form of identity that he could be happy with; he
played various roles – father, husband, celebrity, farm worker – without being
satisfied with any of them. He strove
for a sense of belonging, but could never discover it; in the end his fiction
became a shield from life’s realities, rather than an embodiment of them.
John Dove’s production
suggested that many of these shortcomings could be attributed to Updike’s
over-protective mother Laura (Eileen Atkins).
From a modest background, she spent her life trying to create an ideal
environment for Updike to become a poet.
She persuaded the family to move to an isolated farm in Pennsylvania,
where the youthful Updike would have plenty of time to write on his own. She
dominated her husband Wesley (Stuart
Milligan) to such an extent that he had very little opportunity to develop a
close relationship with their son. Yet
Laura was not without ambition; when not looking after John, she tried to
cultivate a writing career of her own, spending long hours over short stories
and other literary forms, some of which were eventually published in The New Yorker.
The action began with the
adult Updike (Charles Edwards) returning to his mother’s farmhouse for an
unscheduled visit. Although frequently
to explain the reason why he had come, he seemed especially reluctant to
respond. It was only later that we
discovered he had turned his back on his wife and four children and chosen to
marry someone else. Through flashbacks
we found out about Updike’s rather unhappy childhood; his resentment at being
forced to move to the Pennsylvania farm; his futile efforts to relate to his
math-teacher father; and his attempts to prevent his mother from controlling
his life. Even when he became a
celebrity (following the publication of Rabbit
Run in 1960), Updike still felt in some way inadequate; that he had somehow
failed to live up to his mother’s expectations for him. A successful novelist
was in many ways
inferior to a poet (which is what she really wanted him to be).
The only way to deal with such
problems, Updike found, was to write about them in his fiction – a strategy
that antagonized his mother even more.
Having spent her entire life trying to forge a close relationship with
him, he was now refusing to talk to her, but rather solving his emotional
problems through the highly public medium of fiction. She could not understand
that this
represented an attempt on Updike’s part to escape from her influence.
Stylistically speaking, Mrs.
Updike had strong links to other
family dramas such as Edward Albee’s Who’s
Afraid of Virginia Woolf, whose characters end up tearing the emotional
life out of one another, yet realize at the same time that they are
inseparable. Despite her attachment to
her son, Laura resented his success; Updike, on the other hand, could never
convince her that she had little or no talent as a writer. When Updike left
his family, his mother failed
to realize that she might have played a significant part in the decision; an
emotional cripple, Updike could seldom relate to those around him. On the other
hand, Updike offered scant criticism
of his mother’s writings; it was as if he resented her attempts to muscle in on
his creative domain.
In the end, the two of them
set aside their differences – at least for a brief period – and went out on the
porch of the family farmhouse to enjoy the last moments of a summer’s day. Yet
we got the distinct sense that this was
only a brief truce; in a short while they would continue to snipe at one
another.
Sometimes Mrs. Updike proved quite painful listening, as we understood how
the closeness between mother and son prevented them from appreciating one
another’s shortcomings. Ably performed
by Edwards and Atkins – despite the fact that their American accents appeared
forced on occasions – the play offered a penetrating portrait of an ultimately
destructive relationship.